Pricing
Transparent fees for executive-grade investigative work
Know what to expect before you reach out. Standard litigation search fees are fixed per country, per subject — every other engagement is scoped and quoted individually.
Standard Fees
Executive Litigation Search Fees
Fees are quoted per one country and one named individual or entity. Multi-jurisdiction and multi-subject engagements are combined accordingly.
Full Executive Litigation Search
$800 USDCivil, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Divorce — includes Adverse Intelligence Reconciliation Protocol (AIRP) assessment where required
+$400 USD if AIRP assessment is required
Single Component Search
$300 USDCivil, Criminal, Bankruptcy or Divorce — any one component
Documentation Retrieval
By quotationRetrieval of any supporting court filings, judgments or case documentation
Other Services
By quotationAll other investigative, corporate intelligence and GlobalScan access services are provided by quotation, scoped to jurisdiction, subject count and turnaround.
Sample Report
What a completed search looks like
Below is a de-identified excerpt from an actual FLSS litigation search, with every subject identifier, entity name and case number redacted. It illustrates the structure and depth of a completed report before any AIRP assessment is applied.
Confidentiality Notice
This report and any attachments from Faust Legal Support Services Inc. (FLSS) are strictly confidential and may be protected by legal professional privilege. Unauthorized use, reproduction, or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please notify FLSS immediately and delete all copies.
Litigation Search — India (Redacted Sample)
Subject Identifiers
Search Scope
Profile Summary
Subject is a Bengaluru-based venture capitalist known for a long-standing partner role at a major early-stage investment firm, with corporate director registration on file. The subject is regularly cited in business press on themes of unit economics, founder resilience and long-term market structure.
Search Limitations
Supplied names have not been translated into local script. All searches are performed in accordance with applicable court registrar regulations. Many courts do not permit access to records without a signed consent form from a party named in the action or a corporation referenced therein. In certain jurisdictions, search capability may be limited or restricted entirely in the absence of a valid release form.
Identity Verification Standard
FLSS verifies identity linkage against full available identifiers (DOB, address, national ID, occupation) before confirming a match. Every result in this sample has been checked through that verification process; entries still pending full identifier confirmation are flagged accordingly rather than treated as verified.
Information Security Alignment
FLSS maintains an information security framework aligned with ISO/IEC 27001 standards. Internal controls include documented policies for data handling, access management, incident response and system monitoring. While formal certification has not yet been undertaken, processes are structured to meet ISO/IEC 27001 requirements, and certification is planned as resources allow.
Courts & Administrative Bodies Searched
| Institution | Search Result |
|---|---|
| Magistrate Courts (First & Second Class) | No records found. |
| Munsif Courts | Refer to Litigation Records index. |
| District & Sessions Court | Refer to Judgments index. |
| High Court (State Level Appeals) | Refer to Litigation Records index. |
| Supreme Court (Highest Appellate) | No records found. |
| Family Court | No records found. |
| Bankruptcy & Insolvency / Corporate Affairs | No records found. |
| Regulatory & Investigative Bodies | No records found. |
Litigation Records — Previously Supplied
The High Court found that a prior committee order was mischaracterized and was not appealable as originally decided. The appeal was allowed, the lower court's order set aside, and the matter remitted for fresh adjudication. The subject was the petitioner who filed the writ appeal.
FLSS has verified this entry against available identifiers as part of standard confirmation procedure; it is retained here as part of the complete record.
Multiple interlocutory applications are pending. The matter is progressing through objections, written statements and application submissions. The searched name is recorded as Petitioner No. 1.
FLSS has verified this entry against available identifiers as part of standard confirmation procedure; it is retained here as part of the complete record.
Petitioners were previously convicted on lesser charges. The High Court found the identification unreliable and the prosecution's evidence insufficient. Convictions were set aside and petitioners acquitted. The searched name appears as a witness and complainant, not as a petitioner in the revision.
FLSS has verified this entry against available identifiers as part of standard confirmation procedure; it is retained here as part of the complete record.
A commercial dispute alleging wrongful handover of premises was found to be governed by an arbitration clause and not a cognizable offence; the revision petition was dismissed. The subject is listed as a director of the respondent company, but the court found no criminal offence.
FLSS has verified this entry against available identifiers as part of standard confirmation procedure; it is retained here as part of the complete record.
AIRP Annexure Disclosure
This report includes an AIRP annexure attachment covering a consolidated assessment; the annexure forms an integral part of the disclosure record and provides the evidentiary basis for the risk scoring and conclusions presented herein. Refer to Attachment 4.
Conclusions & Recommendations
No additional conclusions or recommendations for this report. This block is intentionally left without further inclusion to preserve report integrity.
Attachments
- Redacted Court Records — Attachment 1
- Redacted Court Records — Attachment 2
- Redacted Court Records — Attachment 3
- AIRP Assessment — Attachment 4
Disclaimer Notice
All or part of the information contained in this report may be subject to applicable data protection and electronic governance laws. FLSS advises that it has complied with all directives and laws in acquiring any information contained in this report, and that storage and transmission of reports has been executed in accordance with relevant privacy and data collection laws. While FLSS believes the information supplied to be reliable and accurate, human or mechanical error remains a possibility. FLSS does not guarantee the accuracy, completeness, timeliness or sequencing of the information. Neither FLSS nor any of its sources, agents or employees shall be responsible for any error or omission, or for the use of, or results obtained from, the information contained in this report.
FLSS Product
What is the AIRP?
The Adverse Intelligence Reconciliation Protocol (AIRP) is FLSS's proprietary assessment methodology for interpreting adverse findings uncovered during a litigation search — regardless of the language or jurisdiction the record originates from.
When a search surfaces an adverse record, the AIRP reconciles it into a structured, English-language assessment covering identity accuracy, financial exposure, litigation history, reputational implications and the integrity of the underlying data.
Example
A court case on a subject is located in Brazil, with judgment recorded in Portuguese. The AIRP translates and interprets the case, then produces a structured English-language assessment — from any language, to any language.
Interpretations
| Flag | Description | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Gap | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Financial Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Litigation Exposure | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Reputational Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Data Integrity | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
Executive Risk Overlay (Vectors)
| Vector | Risk | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Match | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Financial Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Litigation Exposure | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Reputational Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Data Integrity | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
AIRP Score
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Identity Match | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Financial Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Litigation Exposure | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Reputational Risk | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
| Data Integrity | Assessed per case | Assessed per case |
Conclusion
Each AIRP report closes with a plain-English conclusion on the subject relevant to the case — reconciling every flag, vector and score into a single, defensible determination. The AIRP is an FLSS product, owned exclusively by FLSS.
Request a scoped quotation
Tell us the jurisdiction, subject and components required. We will confirm fees, feasibility and turnaround before any work begins.